Categories
Home
 
 
   
I got a call from Collection Agency reg. the Bill sent to me by appartment office.

Question:
I live in NC. I got a call from Collection Agency reg. the Bill sent to me by appartment office. I have requested more information (like, Water Bill, proof of the damage) to Appt.office on receipt of notice.. but instead of sending me the info, they had handed over my case to collection agencies. I have tried to explain the same to Collection Agency but that guy instead of listening to me , he started threatening to report to credit agency saying that debt is legal and they are legally not supposed to provide any information to me and he said that he'd report to credit agency despsite my repeated request for the information. He sounded like I had to pay the amount right away irrespective of weather I agree or not else he'd report to credit agencies.. and he hung up the phone saying case is over he'll document and report to credit agencies.. This was the 1st call I have received from them.. I still not received any written communication from them. I have following questions.
1) What are my rights under this situation. Can collection agency report to creditbeuro w/o giving me opportunity/time to dispute or obtain information?
2) Do I have right to dispute this ? If how do I do that and to whom? Thanks in advance for your help.


Answer:
See the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA): http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpa/fdcpact.htm Particularly note section 809 (Validation of debts), which states that they have to provide you with certain information (unfortunately, it doesn't say they have to provide you with receipts or other proof). Note also that you have 30 days after receipt of that notice to dispute the debt, and they must then go back to the original creditor
(your landlord) for verification _and send you a written copy_ of that verification, before they can take any further action. If you just want them to stop bothering you, you might want to look section 805(c) "Ceasing Communication", but they can still go to court
(sue you) or report the debt to credit bureaus. But if they can't support the claimed debt with appropriate documentation (receipts or other proof of the alleged damage), you can get a lawyer and sue them for "slander of credit," which can cost them a lot of money. Also, I'm not sure of the rules in a case like this where the claim is for damage rather than for a contractual debt. They may not be allowed to report the alleged debt until it has been reduced to a judgement
(that is, they sue you and win). When they sue you, you can see copies of the documentation -- in court if they use small claims, in advance via "discovery" if they use normal court. If you decide not to pay this, you should probably wait a while, then use your right to check your credit reports for free (if you haven't done so in the past year). If this shows up on your credit report, it would be a good idea to see a lawyer to find out if you have a good case for slander of credit. Your best bet is to ask your personal attorney -- the one who handles routine matters like wills -- to recommend a specialist in consumer credit abuses. If you don't have a personal attorney, ask your friends, relatives, and co-workers to ask their attorney for such a recommendation. If several come back with the same name, call that one first. If all else fails, ask your county Bar Association for their referral list, or look in the yellow pages. But a referral from somebody you trust is better than relying on a YP ad, and the Bar Association just lists every lawyer who _says_ he/she works in that speciality. Call up and ask for an appointment. Ask if there will be any charge for the initial consulation. Most good attorneys in this area will do one _free_ consultation to see if you have a case they want to take on. If they take the case, it will be on "contingency". That means you don't pay anything unless you win. Then the lawyer gets a percentage (usually 33%-40%) of whatever the judgement or settlement gives you. Yes, that sounds like a lot, but 60% of something is better than 100% of nothing (or almost nothing). And remember that
_nothing_ comes out of your pocket -- the lawyer gets paid only out of what you win.



Submit your comment or answer


 

Privacy Policy